MAIN


©1996-2018. All Rights Reserved. Online Journal of Veterinary Research . You may not store these pages in any form except for your own personal use. All other usage or distribution is illegal under international copyright treaties. Permission to use any of these pages in any other way besides the before mentioned must be gained in writing from the publisher. This article is exclusively copyrighted in its entirety to OJVR. This article may be copied once but may not be, reproduced or re-transmitted without the express permission of the editors. This journal satisfies the refereeing requirements (DEST) for the Higher Education Research Data Collection (Australia). Linking:To link to this page or any pages linking to this page you must link directly to this page only here rather than put up your own page.


OJVRTM

 Online Journal of Veterinary Research©

 

Volume 18(2):124-131, 2014. Redacted 2017.


Effects of intravaginal progesterone devices on reproductive performance of Arabian ewes during non-breeding season.

 

Parvin Sareminejad, Saleh Tabatabaei, Morteza Mamouei, Khalil Mirzadeh, Mohammad Boujarpour.

 

Department of Animal Science, Ramin University of agriculture and Natural Resources, Ahwaz, Iran

 

ABSTRACT

 

Sareminejad P, Tabatabaei S, Mamouei M, Mirzadeh K, Boujarpour M., Effects of intravaginal progesterone devices on reproductive performance of Arabian ewes during non-breeding season, Onl J Vet Res., 18(2):124-131, 2014. The effects of intravaginal progesterone devices on reproductive performance of Arabian ewes during a non-breeding season is reported. Groups of 21 to 22 Arabian ewes each were given 0.3g medroxy acetate progesterone (MAP) by intravaginal controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices consisting of a nylon core surrounded by a silicone elastomeric impregnated with P4, or sponges embedded with 60 mg MAP for 14 days. A control group of 19 ewes was not treated. After the withdrawal of the impregnated devices each ewe was injected 600 IU eCG. Fertile rams were then mated with 5 each of the treated  ewes. No significant differences were found in fertility (60% vs. 50%), lambing rates (60% vs. 50%) or litter size (1.0 vs 1.0) with progesterone treatments. However the estrous response with CIDR (95.2%) and sponge (91%) treatments was higher compared with controls (5.26%: P<0.05). The mean time of estrous onset in ewes given CIDR was 34.74h compared with MAP sponge treatments (45.23h: h P<0.05). The highest incidence of estrus after removal of the devices in CIDR ewes was 24 to 36h (52.38%) whereas with sponges occurred at 48 to 60h (40.91%). Gestation length in ewes treated with sponges was 153.4d which was higher (P<0.05) compared with those given CIDR (148 day). In treated ewes, progesterone serum cocentrations rose 3 days after insertion of devices. However, at 1 and 50d after insertion, after mating there were no differences in serum progesterone levels between treatments.

 

KEY-WORDS:  Ewes, Progesterone releasing devices, Reproductive performance.


 

MAIN

 

FULL-TEXT (SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE TITLE $25USD)