BACK TO MAIN PAGE

 


©1996-2018. All Rights Reserved. Online Journal of Veterinary Research. You may not store these pages in any form except for your own personal use. All other usage or distribution is illegal under international copyright treaties. Permission to use any of these pages in any other way besides the  before mentioned must be gained in writing from the publisher. This article is exclusively copyrighted in its entirety to OJVR publications. This article may be copied once but may not be, reproduced or  re-transmitted without the express permission of the editors.


OJVRTM

Online Journal of Veterinary Research©

Volume 8:16-21, 2004. Redacted 2018.


Combined use of g-interferon and interleukin-2 receptor assays for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis

 Ritelli M, Amadori M, Dondo A, Begni B, Zoppi S, Archetti IL

 

a Department of Immunoprophylaxis and Animal Welfare, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy b Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy Corresponding Author: Dr. Massimo Amadori, Department of  Immunoprophylaxis and Animal Welfare, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, via A. Bianchi,  9 25124 Brescia, Italy.  

ABSTRACT

 

Ritelli M, Amadori M, Dondo A, Begni B, Zoppi S, Archetti IL. Combined use of g-interferon  and interleukin-2 receptor assays  for diagnosis of   bovine tuberculosis. Onl J Vet Res., 8 : 16-21, 2004. The g-interferon assay for bovine tuberculosis has reached wide acceptance in many countries. Yet, less than optimal specificity in some areas and a certain percentage of inconclusive results may affect this diagnostic technique. The problem of inconclusive results can be approached by a two-stage procedure, whereby peripheral blood mononuclear cells of g-interferon dubious samples are later analyzed for expression of the interleukin-2 receptor; this had been  validated as a further alternative marker of  cell-mediated immunity in M. bovis-infected cattle. This way, the two assays are used sequentially on the same blood samples. As a result, further diagnostic information can be obtained  without new blood samplings in the field. The results of the interleukin-2 receptor assay showed a high correlation with those of the g-interferon assay.  Instead, there was no clear evidence of increased specificity under the conditions reported in this  study.

 

KEYWORDS: Cattle, Tuberculosis, Diagnosis, g-interferon, interleukin-2 receptor


 

BACK TO MAIN PAGE

 

FULL-TEXT (SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE ARTICLE)